Dispute over a new road to industrialization: a debate not completed
Before following the “industrial landmark” and “industry people” column, this starting from the current “industrial road” column will be “looking for soul industry” and to extend and enhance the subject.
“Industrial road” column will focus on China’s industrialization road toward the core of the problem. Topics include “battle of new-type industrialization,” “private breakout and heavy” and “low-carbon economy,” “industrial innovation system”, “smart industrial”, “the old industrial cities in transition” and so on, trying to clarify the confusion of our development: in the end China should choose what kind of a path of industrial development?
While the first wave of the industrial revolution, China has become the laggards, but to catch up in the following ranks of those who, how much China has not lagged behind. Think about the sixties when the eighteenth century the Qing Dynasty officials enlightened “self-reliance” under the banner to open the door to China’s industrialization, Japan is still in the shogunate rule, ten years before the German unification. However, in the historical process of China’s industrialization repeated bad luck, after a nine decades of struggle, China is still a pre-industrialized countries. Therefore, the first generation of the Chinese Communist Party leaders to work hard, “the United States in time for the Premiership,” China into the ranks of industrial countries. However, the status of a closed-door policy, China has not only failed to achieve the goal of generations, but lost the history of the revolution in information technology opportunities. Fortunately, in the reform and opening-up process of China’s industrialization began to accelerate, so, after 140 years of modern times of struggle, the twenty-first century, China has finally bid farewell to the early stages of industrialization, access to the medium term. Looking around the world, developed countries have entered the post-industrialization, China’s road to industrialization in the latter half of how to go from here?
Looking back on 60 years of business: the historical responsibility of entrepreneurs
60th anniversary of the founding of the PRC, economic development, social progress, all aspects of earth-shaking changes have taken place, the National Bureau of Statistics released data that by 2006 China’s urbanization rate reached 42.99 percent, China’s GDP ranks the total number of the world’s top , the founding of the early type of “poor and blank” that has become history. All this shows that the Chinese enterprises and entrepreneurs in the tremendous contribution, and, with the deepening of reform and opening up, Chinese enterprises and entrepreneurs in economic development will play a more important role. Therefore, how to improve the competitiveness of Chinese enterprises, is a very serious topic, I feel we need to enterprises and entrepreneurs concerned about the historical responsibility.
Speaking of the historical responsibility of entrepreneurs, often someone with enterprises and entrepreneurs mix of social responsibility. I think the social responsibility of entrepreneurs and historical responsibility are two different concepts: the social responsibility of entrepreneurs to stage a general performance, the reality of, for example, to the difficulties encountered unexpected donation, the financial crisis is not layoffs, reduction salary, etc., which are embodied in the social responsibility of entrepreneurs; and historical responsibility is different, the historical responsibility of the public examination of the longitudinal entrepreneurs may be years, decades, or longer. In this sense, an entrepreneur easily fulfill social responsibility, the duty to reflect the history much more difficult.
Translate (most links are in Chinese)